So, it that your definition of ESB? It's purpose is to wire services together? I'm not sure all ESB vendors would agree with you...
Anne On 9/17/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a clarification: CXF is not an ESB, its a framework for building > web services (sure we also support non WS stuff, but really its all about > building services - not wiring them together). > > Cheers, > - Dan > > > On 9/16/07, Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From what I've seen, Mule appears to be the most popular open source > > ESB, if that's what you mean. But with so many ESBs to choose from -- both > > commercial and open source -- I don't think that says all that much. The > > market is remarkably overcrowded. > > > > I'd love to hear from folks on this list about their experiences using > > ESBs. Let's start with the open source ones. Is anyone out there willing to > > speak either publicly or privately (please contact me directly) about their > > experience using any of the following: > > > > Mule > > ServiceMix > > JBoss ESB > > WSO2 ESB > > Resin ESB > > Fuse > > Synapse > > Open ESB > > CXF > > PETALS > > OpenCeltix > > Blackbird > > ChainBuilder > > ESB.NET > > > > And does anyone know of any other open source ESBs that I missed in this > > list? > > > > Anne > > > > > > > > On 9/15/07, Steve Jones < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On fire as in popular or on fire as in a burning project going down > > > in flames? > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > On 14/09/2007, jeffrschneider < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Is it just me... or is Mule on fire? > > > > > > > > Jeff > > > > http://schneider.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > MuleSource > http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog > > >
