XP may be efficient for a small organization, but just trying to get business people in an large organization to agree on one point may be difficult - let alone business and IT people to agree may be very difficult. :-)
H.Ozawa --- In [email protected], "Nick Gall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:00 AM, htshozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Having a sound business case and a sound technology architecture is a > > must but I think the question is on HOW to form a consistencies > > between them. Should a project be business driven, technology driven, > > or should each group meet consistently to form a consensus. > > Great point. All stakeholders should meet repeatedly to form and maintain > consensus. This is what XP refers to as "whole team > development<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_Programming_Practices #Whole_team> > ". > > -- Nick > > -- > Nick Gall > Phone: +1.781.608.5871 > AOL IM: Nicholas Gall > Yahoo IM: nick_gall_1117 > MSN IM: (same as email) > Google Talk: (same as email) > Email: nick.gall AT-SIGN gmail DOT com > Weblog: http://ironick.typepad.com/ironick/ >
