>From the blog: "'SOA' has become a bad word. It must be removed from our vocabulary."
Amen to that. But I hope we don't just jump on the next TLA with the same overwrought, over-hyped and over-extended expectations. Just about every thing you mentioned in terms "failed to deliver" is exactly what was said about EAI. Yet the fundamentals of EAI carry on in SO and other architectural approaches. A review of the comments to the blog reveals how varied are the expectations and meanings of "SOA." As you point out, it is the label that has issues, not the concepts behind the label (whatever those concepts may be for a given definition of SOA). Jeff suggested a focus on "the basics of service identification, analysis and design." Amen to that too. -Rob --- In [email protected], "Anne Thomas Manes" <atma...@...> wrote: > > This post should generate a bit of discussion: > > http://apsblog.burtongroup.com/2009/01/soa-is-dead-long-live- > services.html > > Anne >
