Not my invention. It's from Anne. Perhaps she'd like to elaborate.

My interpretation is that it is SO principles applied to integration 
architecture/activity.

-Rob

--- In [email protected], Michael Poulin 
<m3pou...@...> wrote:
>
> Rob, if SOI stands for SO integration, please, explaing what the 
> h... is this?
> - Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Rob Eamon <rea...@...>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:46:49 PM
> Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] SO applied to different 
> architecture levels (was Re: Roch on SOA Failures)
> 
> 
> Wanted to explore the "SOI vs SOA" aspect a bit.
> 
> I've long held that SOA is not a distinct level of architecture. Some agree 
> that SOA is a style, not an architecture itself. The term SOA does not infer 
> any particular level. One can apply SO principles to any architecture.
> 
> Some use the term SOA to refer to an architecture definition, rather than a 
> style. In other words, SOA is EA. SOA infers architecture at the enterprise 
> level. If one is not defining an EA when "doing SOA" then it isn't SOA, it is 
> something else.
> 
> [Some-- at least Steve ;-) -- equate SOA to BA. I'm omitting BA for the 
> purposes of this discussion.]
> 
> It is this latter view that seems to weigh in on the SOI vs. SOA topic and 
> seems to have prompted the invention of the "SOI" term. It implies that 
> architecture is not involved.
> 
> Assuming one agrees with the notion of an "integration architecture" as a 
> possible architectural level, is it reasonable to apply SO principles to the 
> IA? As such, would the IA be an SOA?
> 
> Is applying SO to IA a poor choice? Is defining an IA a poor choice, as 
> opposed to a more encompassing EA effort? Is redefining the EA (e.g. 
> "simplifying their applications and...") the only reasonable path to business 
> agility? Is business agility *the* primary thing to strive for?
> 
> -Rob
> 
> --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, Anne Thomas Manes 
> <atmanes@ > wrote:
> >
> > Most organizations that I've spoken to are using service-oriented
> > middleware to do integration (SOI rather than SOA). Very few 
> > companies are actually rearchitecting their systems, i.e., 
> > simplifying their applications and data architectures in order to 
> > increase agility.
>


Reply via email to