> Why people who only know COBOL have to be taught SO? I think the only thing > they have to be taught is how implement their COBOL projects to produce > resources for others. SO will use those resources w/o informing them how > they are used.
By "knowing COBOL", I mean all the people involved to start, execute, and do maintenance. For example, teams has to create a budget and schedule, which mostly are created based on their past experiences. There's much more to introducing a new concept than just design and implementation. > Plus, I am confused by 'most people know about the benefits SOA will bring - > it's just that they don't know exactly how to implement it within their > projects': benefits of SOA/SO are positioned ABOVE projects, in the > Programmes and Corporate Planning. > I think findings in David Linthicum's article implies that it's not ABOVE projects. H.Ozawa
