On 2/14/14 7:45 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 2/13/14 5:01 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Please, review the fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034249
Open webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/hotspot/8034249-JVMTI-MON.1
src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.hpp
line 360 and 446 are a bit long
I'll split the lines.
src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnv.cpp
No comments.
Thumbs up.
Thank you for review!
Serguei
Dan
Summary:
This issue was identified in the review of the 8032223 and it is
similar to the 8032223
but impacts different JVMTI functions:
GetCurrentContendedMonitor, GetOwnedMonitorInfo,
GetOwnedMonitorStackDepthInfo, GetStackTrace
There is a general issue in the suspend equivalent condition
mechanism:
Two subsequent calls to the JvmtiEnv::is_thread_fully_suspended()
may return different results:
- 1-st: true
- 2-nd: false
This suspend equivalent issue is covered by another bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6280037
This fix is to work around the 6280037.
It is more safe to collect the necesary information at a safepoint
instead of
relying on the suspension of the target thread.
Testing:
In progress: nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi, nsk.jdwp, JTreg com/sun/jdi
Thanks,
Serguei