Hi Serguei, This looks good to me.
I wonder if we will reach a point where we can delete is_thread_fully_suspended? ;-)
David On 14/02/2014 10:01 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Please, review the fix for: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034249 Open webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/hotspot/8034249-JVMTI-MON.1 Summary: This issue was identified in the review of the 8032223 and it is similar to the 8032223 but impacts different JVMTI functions: GetCurrentContendedMonitor, GetOwnedMonitorInfo, GetOwnedMonitorStackDepthInfo, GetStackTrace There is a general issue in the suspend equivalent condition mechanism: Two subsequent calls to the JvmtiEnv::is_thread_fully_suspended() may return different results: - 1-st: true - 2-nd: false This suspend equivalent issue is covered by another bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6280037 This fix is to work around the 6280037. It is more safe to collect the necesary information at a safepoint instead of relying on the suspension of the target thread. Testing: In progress: nsk.jvmti, nsk.jdi, nsk.jdwp, JTreg com/sun/jdi Thanks, Serguei
