On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:04:06 GMT, Johan Sjölen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/memory/metaspace/blockTree.hpp line 228:
>>
>>> 226: DEBUG_ONLY(check_node(insertion_point);)
>>> 227: if (n->_word_size == insertion_point->_word_size) {
>>> 228: add_to_list(n, insertion_point); // parent stays null in this
>>> case.
>>
>> Small nit. Do we have a unified naming scheme for comments?
>>
>> "null" reads like a java null. I prefer keeping NULL in comments.
>
>>Small nit. Do we have a unified naming scheme for comments?
>
> Yeah, I forgot to update the PR message with all of the info. If you check
> now you can see what's been decided upon. The discussions can be found in
> previous PRs, I can link to them if you're curious.
>
>>"null" reads like a java null. I prefer keeping NULL in comments.
>
> That's true, but this probably can be inferred from context which one is
> meant quite easily? I'd be more keen on explicitly saying that something is a
> Java null.
FWIW, from fixing these reviews I've never seen us referring to a Java null
when we meant a C++ nullptr.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12185
