> Rename createJavaProcessBuilder so that it is not used by mistake instead of > createTestJvm. > > I have used the following sed script: `find -name "*.java" | xargs -n 1 sed > -i -e > "s/createJavaProcessBuilder(/createJavaProcessBuilderIgnoreTestJavaOpts(/g"` > > Then I have manually modified ProcessTools.java. In that file I have moved > one version of createJavaProcessBuilder so that it is close to the other > version. Then I have added a javadoc comment in bold telling: > > /** > * Create ProcessBuilder using the java launcher from the jdk to > * be tested. > * > * <p><b> Please observe that you likely should use > * createTestJvm() instead of this method because createTestJvm() > * will add JVM options from "test.vm.opts" and "test.java.opts" > * </b> and this method will not do that. > * > * @param command Arguments to pass to the java command. > * @return The ProcessBuilder instance representing the java command. > */ > > > I have used the name createJavaProcessBuilderIgnoreTestJavaOpts because of > the name of Utils.prependTestJavaOpts that adds those VM flags. If you have a > better name I could do a rename of the method. I kind of like that it is long > and clumsy, that makes it harder to use... > > I have run tier 1 testing, and I have started more exhaustive testing.
Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: copyright ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15452/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15452/files/4b2d1711..f3418c80 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15452&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15452&range=00-01 Stats: 344 lines in 344 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 344 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15452.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15452/head:pull/15452 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15452
