On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:45:12 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I don't think this is the best change across so many files. >> It gives a very ugly name to a common test function and affects a very large >> number of tests. > >> @RogerRiggs If it is only the name you want changed, maybe you can offer a >> better name? > @lkorinth > > Sorry for the too short comment; I wanted to make sure it wasn't integrated > before I could look at it more closely. > Neither the bug report or the PR describe the problem and its ramifications, > only the solution. > Can you elaborate on the conditions that lead to this. (and include them in > the bug report). @RogerRiggs , @plummercj , please see the additional discussion in the parent bug: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8314823 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15452#issuecomment-1698629345
