On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:23:55 GMT, Leo Korinth <lkori...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Rename createJavaProcessBuilder so that it is not used by mistake instead of >> createTestJvm. >> >> I have used the following sed script: `find -name "*.java" | xargs -n 1 sed >> -i -e >> "s/createJavaProcessBuilder(/createJavaProcessBuilderIgnoreTestJavaOpts(/g"` >> >> Then I have manually modified ProcessTools.java. In that file I have moved >> one version of createJavaProcessBuilder so that it is close to the other >> version. Then I have added a javadoc comment in bold telling: >> >> /** >> * Create ProcessBuilder using the java launcher from the jdk to >> * be tested. >> * >> * <p><b> Please observe that you likely should use >> * createTestJvm() instead of this method because createTestJvm() >> * will add JVM options from "test.vm.opts" and "test.java.opts" >> * </b> and this method will not do that. >> * >> * @param command Arguments to pass to the java command. >> * @return The ProcessBuilder instance representing the java command. >> */ >> >> >> I have used the name createJavaProcessBuilderIgnoreTestJavaOpts because of >> the name of Utils.prependTestJavaOpts that adds those VM flags. If you have >> a better name I could do a rename of the method. I kind of like that it is >> long and clumsy, that makes it harder to use... >> >> I have run tier 1 testing, and I have started more exhaustive testing. > > Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > fix static import I have created an alternative that uses enums to force the user to make a decision: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/compare/master...lkorinth:jdk:+process_tools . Another alternative is to do the same but instead using an enum (I think it is not as good). A third alternative is to use the current pull request with a better name. What do you prefer? Do you have a better alternative? Do someone still think the current code is good? I think what we have today is inferior to all these improvements, and I would like to make it harder to develop bad test cases. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15452#issuecomment-1705068700
