serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v3] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing [v3] Casper Norrbin
  • Integrated: 8380129: Remove AccessFlags::print_on in favor of context-specific printing Casper Norrbin
• RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Ekaterina Pavlova
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v2] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v3] Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8316439: Several jvmti tests fail with -Xcheck:jni Shiv Shah
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v34] Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and JTREG_USAGE_TRACKER=true Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and JTREG_USAGE_TRACKER=true David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and JTREG_USAGE_TRACKER=true Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and JTREG_USAGE_TRACKER=true Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and JTREG_USAGE_TRACKER=true Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and JTREG_USAGE_TRACKER=true Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and Java Usage Tracker enabled Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8381385: nsk/jdi/ClassLoaderReference/visibleClasses/visibleclasses002/ fails with --enable-preview and Java Usage Tracker enabled Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v33] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v33] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v33] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v33] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v33] Xueming Shen
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v32] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8381900: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP03/ap03t001 does not handle frequent GC gracefully Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8381900: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP03/ap03t001 does not handle frequent GC gracefully Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8381900: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP03/ap03t001 does not handle frequent GC gracefully Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8381900: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP03/ap03t001 does not handle frequent GC gracefully Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8381900: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/allocation/AP03/ap03t001 does not handle frequent GC gracefully Joel Sikström
• RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v2] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v3] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v4] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v5] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v5] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v6] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v7] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v7] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v7] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v8] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd [v9] duke
  • Integrated: 8357439: Add bash autocompletion for jcmd Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Egor Ushakov
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v23] Patricio Chilano Mateo
• RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v4] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v4] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v5] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v6] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start [v6] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8362350: recompute_enable hit assertion "should never come here before live phase" if happens in post_vm_start Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v22] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v21] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v20] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v9] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8381658: Update nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling to better test virtual threads Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v31] Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v3] Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v3] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance [v3] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Integrated: 8381609: com/sun/jdi/EATests.java should not synchronize on an Integer instance Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 6960970: Debugger very slow during stepping [v19] Serguei Spitsyn
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v30] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8379819: Creating AOT configuration crashes in MethodTrainingData::prepare Igor Veresov
  • Re: RFR: 8379819: Creating AOT configuration crashes in MethodTrainingData::prepare [v2] Igor Veresov
  • Re: RFR: 8379819: Creating AOT configuration crashes in MethodTrainingData::prepare [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8379819: Creating AOT configuration crashes in MethodTrainingData::prepare [v3] Igor Veresov
  • Re: RFR: 8379819: Creating AOT configuration crashes in MethodTrainingData::prepare [v3] Igor Veresov

• Earlier messages
• Later messages