serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode AR3
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v3] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v2] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v2] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v5] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v5] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v5] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v6] Justus Garbe
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v6] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v6] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode [v6] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8352077: Fatal error: unhandled bytecode Justus Garbe
• RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Shiv Shah
  • Re: RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Ekaterina Pavlova
  • Re: RFR: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError duke
  • Integrated: 8392122: Test jdk/internal/platform/docker/TestDockerMemoryMetrics.java fails with OutOfMemoryError Shiv Shah
• RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Integrated: 8384612: Test serviceability/dcmd/gc/HeapDumpParallelTest.java failed on a single core machine Yunbo Zhang
• RFR: 8393535: ArrayClassTest needs to avoid deprecated MBeanServer method Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8393535: Remove implementations of deprecated MBeanServer method, and update ArrayClassTest [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8393535: Remove implementations of deprecated MBeanServer method, and update ArrayClassTest [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8393535: Remove implementations of deprecated MBeanServer method, and update ArrayClassTest [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8393535: Remove implementations of deprecated MBeanServer method, and update ArrayClassTest [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Integrated: 8393535: Remove implementations of deprecated MBeanServer method, and update ArrayClassTest Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8393535: Remove ArrayClassTest that tests deprecated MBeanServer method Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8393535: Remove ArrayClassTest that tests deprecated MBeanServer method Kevin Walls
  • Withdrawn: 8393535: Remove ArrayClassTest that tests deprecated MBeanServer method Kevin Walls
• [External] : [bsd-port:bsd-port] RFR: Fix debugd connect test on FreeBSD Harald Eilertsen
• Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v38] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v15] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v2] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v3] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v3] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v3] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v4] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Integrated: 8393263: JVM Tool Interface spec presentation needs work Hannes Wallnöfer
• RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v3] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v3] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: RFR: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Integrated: 8393454: Rename ValueFieldLayoutInfo to ValueFieldInfo Stefan Karlsson
• RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies [v3] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Integrated: 8393458: Fix various include guard inconsistencies Stefan Karlsson
• RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects [v4] Leonid Mesnik
  • Integrated: 8389460: JVMTI IterateThroughHeap class filter skips flattened value objects Serguei Spitsyn
• [External] : JFR can tell us where CPU went — we made it tell us which API (review requested) Roy Zhang
  • Re: [External] : JFR can tell us where CPU went — we made it tell us which API (review requested) David Holmes
  • Re: [External] : JFR can tell us where CPU went — we made it tell us which API (review requested) Roy Zhang
  • Re: [External] : JFR can tell us where CPU went — we made it tell us which API (review requested) Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Integrated: 8393375: Several CDS tests fail in cross-build configurations due to missing classes.jsa Arno Zeller
• RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8393201: Most SA tests fail with timeout on macOS 26.6.2 and 27 due to not properly detaching from the debuggee process Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v37] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Andrei Pangin
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Andrei Pangin
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v5] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Xin Liu
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Andrei Pangin
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Xin Liu
  • Re: RFR: 8373791: JFR: Add native frames to jdk.CPUTimeSample event [v3] Andrei Pangin
• RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v2] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v3] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v5] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v6] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v6] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v7] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v7] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v7] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides [v7] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Integrated: 8377548: Implement dark theme for other specs and tool guides Hannes Wallnöfer
• Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v36] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v35] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v35] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v35] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v12] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8378084: Implement JEP 528: Post-Mortem Crash Analysis with jcmd [v34] Kevin Walls
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v13] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
• RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v2] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v3] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v3] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v4] Yunbo Zhang
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8392135: Unified logging creates extra log files [v5] Yunbo Zhang
• Re: RFR: 8266337: ThreadTimesClosure doesn't handle exceptions properly [v2] Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v11] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v10] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF sendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8392132: Test serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java#xcomp failed: Could not find PC in DWARF [v3] Chris Plummer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages