On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:08:14 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR includes a couple of clarifications of the JDWP and JDI invoke 
>> method support. The first is that deadlocks can occur due to a needed 
>> "resource" being held. The spec previously just mentioned monitors being 
>> held, but this is too specific. The second is to clarify that an invoke on a 
>> virtual thread can be more prone to deadlocks than a platform thread may be.
>> 
>> I did a doc build you can look at to view the changes. Links to the relevant 
>> sections are below:
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_ClassType_InvokeMethod
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_ClassType_NewInstance
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_InterfaceType_InvokeMethod
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_ObjectReference_InvokeMethod
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/ClassType.html#invokeMethod(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int)
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/ClassType.html#newInstance(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int)
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/InterfaceType.html#invokeMethod(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int)
>> 
>> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/ObjectReference.html#invokeMethod(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int)
>
> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use @apiNote. Remove additional virtual thread warning from jdwp spec.

Updates looks good to me.

Thanks

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15695#pullrequestreview-1628001925

Reply via email to