On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:08:14 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR includes a couple of clarifications of the JDWP and JDI invoke >> method support. The first is that deadlocks can occur due to a needed >> "resource" being held. The spec previously just mentioned monitors being >> held, but this is too specific. The second is to clarify that an invoke on a >> virtual thread can be more prone to deadlocks than a platform thread may be. >> >> I did a doc build you can look at to view the changes. Links to the relevant >> sections are below: >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_ClassType_InvokeMethod >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_ClassType_NewInstance >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_InterfaceType_InvokeMethod >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/specs/jdwp/jdwp-protocol.html#JDWP_ObjectReference_InvokeMethod >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/ClassType.html#invokeMethod(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int) >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/ClassType.html#newInstance(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int) >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/InterfaceType.html#invokeMethod(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int) >> >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~cjplummer/8301639/docs.01/api/jdk.jdi/com/sun/jdi/ObjectReference.html#invokeMethod(com.sun.jdi.ThreadReference,com.sun.jdi.Method,java.util.List,int) > > Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Use @apiNote. Remove additional virtual thread warning from jdwp spec. CSR has been created: [JDK-8301639](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301639) ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15695#issuecomment-1721897239