On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 02:44:59 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Maybe SA is seeing a monitor in the monitor cache that it is only seeing >> because the monitor cache is currently inconsistent (due to SA not safe >> pointing). So the question is whether the monitor cache can be in a state >> where it still contains a reference to an anonymous monitor, but no thread >> actually owns the monitor (and the anonymous monitor is about to be purged >> from the cache). > > Looks like you answered my question while I was asking it. And I shouldn't have said "cache". I was confusing this PR with another dealing with the Monitor Cache. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15907#discussion_r1336568286
