On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 10:46:21 GMT, Johan Sjölen <jsjo...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yes, it resulted in a significant performance gain for a test run where I >> interleaved non-committed and committed memory of the same tag. I may have >> been mistaken, of course. > > It being committed or reserved shouldn't matter (I assume non-committed = > reserved), as committed just means that there's a pointer to the committed > memory region in the reserved memory region. Well, all I can say is that I'm > surprised. They differ by permissions. I guess NMT keeps them separate for that reason. In any case, the code snippet makes a huge difference. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16301#discussion_r1380031435
