On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:52:23 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi @JoKern65  Is this good to integrate now ?
>
> @suchismith1993 
> 
>> Once this code goes in I can push in my changes. We are targeting the fix 
>> for January.
> 
> If you talk about https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16604, no, you cannot 
> push that even if Joachim finishes his work.
> 
> Your patch has not even a single review, is quite controversial, and none of 
> the issues the reviewers have mentioned are addressed. This needs a lot more 
> discussion time.

> > @tstuefe Sorry to tag you. Can you review the code. Once this code goes in 
> > I can push in my changes.
> > We are targeting the fix for January.
> 
> > Hi @JoKern65 Is this good to integrate now ?
> 
> @suchismith1993 Please don't put pressure on patch authors and developers. 
> There is zero reason why this patch should be rushed.
> 
> > Hi @suchismith1993, I'm waiting for a second review. Complex hotspot 
> > changes should be reviewed twice.
> 
> Not only that, hotspot changes _need_ to be reviewed by at least two 
> reviewers. That is not optional. See OpenJDK bylaws.

Sorry about that.  The fix was critical for the adoptium builds and hence was 
looking to fix this soon.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16920#issuecomment-1862776678

Reply via email to