On Sun, 26 May 2024 14:24:27 GMT, SendaoYan <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > That would mean it's not tested. I suspect the > > java_lang_VirtualThread::is_instance checks will need to be changed to test > > with is_a(vmClasses::BaseVirtualThread_klass()) to allow for the > > alternative implementation. > > Do you mean change like this: No, I meant in JvmtiEnvBase::get_object_monitor_usage that you'll need to go through all places where it tests if the thread is a virtual thread, they will need to be changed to support the alternative implementation. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19405#issuecomment-2132281742
