On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:35:13 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> What would you think about dropping the sentence "The JMX Remote API allows >> the use of different type of connectors" and drop "User-defined" from the >> last list item? Doing that makes it much easier to say that the RMI >> Connector is standard and that other Connectors are possible using using the >> JMXConnectorFactory. It removes any discussion as to whether there are two >> or three "difference types". >> >> I think we want "RMI Connector" to link to either RMIConnector or to the >> java.management.rmi module description. >> >> My concern with having a historical note is that it invites readers to >> search for these other "interesting" optional parts, and they will be >> disappointed. If you do have a historical note then I think it need to say >> more than "are not part of the Java Platform", it will also need to say that >> they are not included in the JDK. > > OK - let's drop the historical note then. > What would you think about dropping the sentence "The JMX Remote API allows > the use of different type of connectors" and drop "User-defined" from the > last list item Yes that's fine. As is "User-defined connector protocols..." -> "Other connector protocols..." ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25670#discussion_r2131778600
