On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:50:23 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> It would put the onus on the debugger to interrupt, which I think is the > right thing to do. it would remove the interrupt from > JavaThread::install_async_exception and would mean no change to > JavaThread::sleep_nanos. Thank you for the suggestion. I've tested it and found that a couple of tests are failed including one JCK test. So, at a minimum this approach is going to be more complicated, it would require a supporting JDI update, consultation with the IDE vendors, CSR and a release note. Also, I kind of share the David's concern above. So, I'm thinking if it is okay to separate this effort from the current fix. I can file an enhancement if it makes sense and worth it. As I see, the tweak in `JavaThread::sleep_nanos()` is not really needed, so I'll remove it now. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26365#issuecomment-3131566270
