On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 23:45:09 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I don't think the current proposed change (which drop's setting the interrupt
> flag in install_async_exception) will cause a target thread blocked in sleep
> to wakeup. A target thread blocked in JavaThread::sleep_nanos will wakeup
> from park_nanos but will just park again with the remaining time.
Thank you checking this. I've restored the tweak in the
`JavaThread::sleep_nanos()`.
> I assume this is the test failures that Serguei mentions.
The test failures I mentioned were after an attempt to remove the following
lines from the `JavaThread::install_async_exception()`:
oop vt_oop = vthread();
if (vt_oop == nullptr || !vt_oop->is_a(vmClasses::BaseVirtualThread_klass()))
{
// Interrupt thread so it will wake up from a potential
wait()/sleep()/park()
this->interrupt();
}
```
In order to remove the above a corresponding update in the jdwp/debugger is
additionally needed to invoke the JVMTI `ThreadInterrupt()`.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26365#issuecomment-3135163510
