On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:44:26 GMT, Kim Barrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > `AtomicAccess` is a bit wordy, and this change is going to mess up diffs > > for backports terribly, but I can't think of a better way to do it. Thanks. > > There was a bunch of internal to Oracle bike shedding over the names already. Sure, I imagine there was! It's a shame when decision making happens behind closed doors in a FOSS project, but public list bikeshedding would have been too much for this change. > Diffs for backports are going to get messed up anyway, since most uses of > `AtomicAccess` will eventually be switched over to `Atomic<T>` style usage. That's fair. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27135#issuecomment-3265596419
