On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:37:02 GMT, Casper Norrbin <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> `AccessFlags::print_on` is used for class, field and method printing, but 
>> those entities do not share the same modifier set. The current helper 
>> hard-codes a single mixed list of access flags for all 3 and is thus unaware 
>> of the type of the printed value. Instead of using a single shared printing 
>> function, we should move the printing to the relevant class, field, and 
>> method call sites. This makes the printer aware of the type it is printing 
>> and lets us check only the flags that are relevant for that type.
>> 
>> For this change, I remove `AccessFlags::print_on` and split the printing 
>> into 3 separate helpers:
>> - `InstanceKlass::print_class_flags`
>> - `Method::print_access_flags`
>> - `fieldDescriptor::print_access_flags`
>> 
>> As a part of that, I added the missing `AccessFlags` predicates used by each 
>> of the new printers, and updated each printer to check all the flags 
>> relevant for its type, as defined by `jvm_constants.h`. This lets us cover 
>> class-specific, method-specific, and field-specific modifiers that were not 
>> handled before.
>> 
>> I also added new gtests covering each of the 3 printing helpers and the 
>> previously missing flags.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> - Oracle tiers 1-3
>> - New gtests covering each of the printing helpers and each of the new flags
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Casper Norrbin has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   reorder private/public/protected in instanceklass

Nothing further from me. Thanks

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30746#pullrequestreview-4136599732

Reply via email to