On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:47:03 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> The line followed the if {} else {} statement because both printed that
>> line, so I had to copy it because the raw monitor-only case did not want to
>> copy it. It came out looking like this:
>>
>> Found one Java-level deadlock:
>> =============================
>> "Thread-1":
>> waiting to lock JVM TI raw monitor 0x00007fda347cb460,
>> which is held by "Thread-2"
>> ,
>> which is held by "Thread-2"
>
> We could move this under an `else` branch and remove the `continue` above.
yeah, don't like the continue.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32092#discussion_r3685450081
