On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:08:15 GMT, Chris Plummer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Right, but I mean the extra sentence that mentions that this is not always >> needed is still correct. > > I want to keep this simple. How about "Make sure the debuggee exits the loop > even if the async exception was not thrown". I don't want the debugger side > to be presumptuous about what has happened on the debuggee side. Bugs might > interfere with expectations. That’s fine. Note the same comment is present in TEST#3 above. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32403#discussion_r3822568572
