I'll agree w/ that. I have a K6/2-500 and was running 128 megs. I added
another 128 megs and my seti times have jumped an average of 9 hrs per WU.
I went from an avg of 24 hrs to about 33 hrs. It's kind of frustrating. I
have my Seti running all the time. Adding the ram should't be hurting my
times ....that much should it?
Broc Olson < Byark!>
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Gerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: RAM, etc.
>
> hi All
>
> I ran into a similar with AMD K6 series processors, I found that between
64 to 128
> MB was noticeably faster than 256 MB or more, now i am running a PIII a
T-Bird, a
> Duron and a Classic Athlon and have not noticed the same correlation, i am
running
> at least 256 in all of them. When i had a PII it also did not seem to have
the same
> effect. I am not familiar with Dell model #s so have no Idea what the
configuration
> might be, but on the T-Bird it seems to go slightly faster by using cas 2
ram as
> opposed to cas 3. I run both the cmd line version for NT and the linux one
so don't
> know if that will help or not, but good luck.
> I can't hurt to check the memory configuration in Bios and make sure that
the new is
> at least as fast as the old e.g. pc133 cas2 is faster than pc133 cas 3...
>
> Good luck.
>
> Charity wrote:
==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
