Hi Yrineu,

Please reach out to me, if you face any issue because of this patch.

Thanks
Anil

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Yrineu Rodrigues <yfrfel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This does not causes big impacts on NIC project, but I'm looking to ensure
> that all tests will work properly after merge it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> No, it's not how it is supposed to work.
>>
>> Existing tcp_flag api's in openflowplugin had no implementation in
>> openflowplugin project ( although there are models defined for it in
>> plugin), so i was under impression that no project should be using it,
>> because it's not going to work for them. Probably i should have check'ed it
>> rather than assuming it. So under that assumption, i thought we don't
>> really need a waiver for this change.
>>
>> Given that TCP Flags is now approved ONF extension for OpenFlow 1.3, I
>> added the support for the API's. OpenFlowplugin patch that I pushed was
>> dependent on the OpenFlow java patch. Michal reviewed and merged
>> openflowjava patch, so i merged the openflowplugin patch as well, otherwise
>> openflowplugin build is going to break. That will eventual break all the
>> dependent projects as well.
>>
>> I merged my own patch, because there was no committer available to review
>> this patch at 2 AM PST, so rather than putting projects on the risk of
>> build failure, I merged it. This is something which we have done in the
>> past as well to avoid similar situations.
>>
>> I don't see groupbasedpolicy project is impacted by this change. Verify
>> build of groupbasedpolicy is fine (#7, #8 were triggered after the
>> openflowplugin patch merge)
>>
>>
>> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/groupbasedpolicy/job/groupbasedpolicy-verify-boron-mvn33-openjdk8/
>>
>> Hope it answer some of your questions.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Anil
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Brady Allen Johnson <
>> brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There is something I dont understand here: You're looking for an
>>> agreement, but you authored the patch, and you merged it yourself. We didnt
>>> get any chance to agree or disagree.
>>>
>>> Is this how API Freeze Waivers are supposed to work?
>>>
>>> BTW, Im adding GBP, since they are affected too.
>>>
>>> Brady
>>>
>>> On 03/08/16 22:43, Anil Vishnoi wrote:
>>>
>>> + release
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ​Note: This email is to seek agreement on a waiver of API FREEZE.
>>>>
>>>> The patch for wich a waiver of API FREEZE is being sought is:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/42630
>>>>
>>>> and it is contributed to:
>>>> OpenFlow Plugin project
>>>>
>>>> The following projects have been determined to be impacted:
>>>>
>>>> genius Consumer
>>>> netvirt Consumer
>>>> vtn Consumer
>>>> nic Consumer
>>>> sfc Consumer
>>>> didm Consumer
>>>>
>>>> Agreement to waive API FREEZE for
>>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/42630
>>>>
>>>> will be indicated by +1 from each project representative on the Gerrit
>>>> itself.
>>>>
>>>> There is no agreement to waive API FREEZE until all project
>>>> representatives have +1ed the Gerrit.
>>>>
>>>> This email is *only* about waiving of API FREEZE, normal code review
>>>> will proceed in the normal fashion
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>> This patch is  already merged and respective fixes are pushed to the
>>>> impacted projects:
>>>>
>>>> genius : https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43047  (merged)
>>>> netvirt https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43049 (merged)
>>>> vtn https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43038 (merged)
>>>> nic https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43077 (waiting for review)
>>>> sfc https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43082 (waiting for review)
>>>> didm https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43086 (waiting for review)
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Anil
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> Anil
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TSC mailing 
>>> listTSC@lists.opendaylight.orghttps://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Anil
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nic-dev mailing list
>> nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org
>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/nic-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Yrineu Rodrigues*
> *OpendayLight NIC PTL/committer*
> --
>
> *Linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/in/yrineu>*
> *NIC wiki page*
> <https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Network_Intent_Composition:Main>
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Anil
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Reply via email to