> > screen > > sudo > > There's generally been resistance from the ARC to shipping setuid freeware > programs. What's happened in the past is that they can ship, but without > the setuid bit set. They probably could be shipped fully enabled, but only > after a thorough security evaluation (and blessings from Casper, likely).
Ok will backburn for now. > > top > > There's been lots of discussion about this lately. It may be a better idea > to enhance prstat to optionally make it look a bit more like top, and to > add obviously missing features. I am fine with the approach of adding prstat stuff to top and/ or bringing 'top' functioanlity and more importantly, 'top' interface to prstat. I just wouldn't be the right man for the job. Would it be too much to propose it on list with the caveate that says we will do this unless someone is willing to step up to the plate to refactor prstat to have a top mode. > > torque > > This'll be interesting. Why would you want that without openpbs? And how You wouldn't. For some reason I thought they came together. > would it interact with Sun Cluster? ?o. Keep in mind that torque/pbs supports very loose clusters. I could however see using suncluster to provide a sharedfs to help with certain workloads.
