Danek Duvall wrote On 05/14/07 10:51,:
>On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:44:56AM -0700, Joseph Kowalski wrote: > > > >>By our conventions, even the existing section 3 pages go >>into a new subsection, not just man3. All that is in man3 >>these days are intros and pages that describe entire >>libraries. >> >> > >Looks like a couple of FOSS manpages snuck in there -- the set from neon >and that from brlapi. Probably a bug that can be fixed. > >However, if you're going to separate the C APIs from the tcl APIs, then >you'll need different subsection names, for a total of four. Have a >proposal? > >Danek > > You really aren't suggesting I propose TLA's are you? Could do something as simple as tkc and tclc. Or, it might be possible to place all the tk manpages in a single section iff the man pages themselves made it clear what was C and what wasn't. Having non-C APIs in section 3 is the strange thing. Maybe that's where we aren't doing the rational thing. - jek3
