> >> These ARC cases are for integration to Solaris, so > /opt is inappropriate, > >> and /usr is correct. > > > > Oh in that case, I agree. *Provided* that the > CoolStack stuff will replace > > the current stuff on the Solaris distribution > media. > > Just for clarification, the integration that Stefan > is working on isn't > of CoolStack per-se. He has worked closely with that > particular team > to gather requirements and optimizations but this > project is a separate > effort to integrate a subset of web tier components > into OpenSolaris > along with many of their underlying dependencies. > > After the initial phase of the project has been > completed, the intent > is to integrate additional web tier components (and > their various > dependencies). >
So to clarify the CoolStack developers should be notified that any bugs or enhancements that would been encountered should be logged into b.o.o. which is not part of the Coolstack communications channel correct? Seems the Coolstack development platform is more open than the OpenSolaris because at least you can add comments to the bug database in CoolStack as opposed to OpenSolaris development platforms. I don't mind duplication in efforts but where are we going with all this. More closed or more open? I'm not exactly impressed that Coolstack is using gcc 32bit for the Solaris Opteron port either. What a friggen mess. ---Bob This message posted from opensolaris.org
