David.Comay at sun.com wrote: > Stefan, > >> 2. The currently proposed Apache 2.2.4 integration installs Apache in >> /usr/apache2, thereby _overwriting_ the existing Apache 2.0.x. Valid >> arguments have been made pro, and against this approach, with the >> suggestion that Apache 2.2.4 installs in /usr/apache2.2, thereby >> preserving the existing /usr/apache2. However, this alternate location >> would *not* alter the EOF/EOL timeout announced for Apache 2.0.x. > > Just to clarify, the overwriting we're talking about is of the Apache > 2.0.x binaries and libraries (or from a System V packaging perspective, > the "f" files that the vendor - for example, Sun - delivers) and we're > not talking about overwriting the configuration files (the so-called > "e" files). Is that correct?
Correct. Existing configuration files will *not* be overwritten. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman Sun Microsystems, Inc. Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM
