[responding to my own post - sorry] John Plocher wrote: > Stefan Teleman wrote: >> 2. The currently proposed Apache 2.2.4 integration installs Apache in >> /usr/apache2, thereby _overwriting_ the existing Apache 2.0.x. > As much as I would like to be able to run both > old and new side-by-side, it isn't worth the additional admin > complexity that it entails. Please don't go there.
I should have been clearer - I like this overwrite proposal (as opposed to a the counter of having /usr/apache, /usr/apache2 and /usr/apache2.2), as long as the svc manifest names are the same as used by the current apache2 installation (svc:/network/http:apache) and not, for example, svc:/network/http:apache2.2. -John
