On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:18:07AM +0100, przemolicc at poczta.fm wrote: > > > 2. The currently proposed Apache 2.2.4 integration installs Apache in > > /usr/apache2, thereby _overwriting_ the existing Apache 2.0.x. Valid > > arguments have been made pro, and against this approach, with the > > suggestion that Apache 2.2.4 installs in /usr/apache2.2, thereby preserving > > the existing /usr/apache2. However, this alternate location would *not* > > alter the EOF/EOL timeout announced for Apache 2.0.x. > > Whatever proposal wins it should preserve _choice_ for admins/developers. > Let _them_ decide which version they are going to use. > If we are going to compete with linux we should give choice because > one of linux strength is giving choice (one may disagree with me but I > have written "one of"). > > After all the configuration (and the choice !) is for them: admins/developers.
To add something: it is not difficult to imagine situation when production environment is using apache 2.0 and testing/development environment moved to apache 2.2 (still on the same physical server - especially using zones). IMHO capability of using both concurrently is the most convenient and may atract much more admins and developers. Regards przemol ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jestes kierowca? To poczytaj! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f199e
