Vivek, Vivek Titarmare wrote: > > The license page says about GPL, ASL and MIT License Should I mention all > the 3 licenses? > Should the copyright file mention only about the > http://www.slf4j.org/license.html text? (Actually this text does not have > contain specifically GPL, ASL and MIT license) > > Pl. suggest.
Sorry I do not know, try asking Norm or Mike (CC'ed) Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Cunningham [mailto:paul.cunningham at tadpole.com] > > This looks okay except for below .... > > > Vivek Titarmare wrote: >> Yes, the url and the license are correct. I was able to open the url > today. >> Seems to be some issue yesterday on opening the url. >> >> Rest of the changes are done and webrev uploaded at >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vivekrt/6835986-slf4j/ . >> >> Let me know if I am missing any. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Cunningham [mailto:paul.cunningham at tadpole.com] > >> Paul Cunningham wrote: > >>> Vivek Titarmare wrote: >>>> I have posted a webrev for package "slf4j" which I am porting to >>>> Nevada and would like to request a code review. Please see the link > below >>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~vivekrt/6835986-slf4j/ > > .. cut .. > >>> 3. usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWslf4j/copyright >>> & usr/src/lib/slf4j/METADATA >>> Is the licence correct here ? > > What I was trying to point out here was ... > > in the METADATA file it says ... > 4 LICENSE: GPL > but the pkg's website licence says different ... > http://www.slf4j.org/license.html > so why are you referring to the GPL licence? Don't you just need what is > in http://www.slf4j.org/license.html in the 'SUNWslf4j/copyright' file > (plus any source-owner copyright lines). > > .. cut .. > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Cunningham Software Engineer Tadpole Business Unit
