yes, METADATA would be a good place for this - Sriram
Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 00:07 -0700, Sriram Natarajan wrote: > >> Hi >> If you can add a note as to why you need those extra patches within >> libxml2/libxslt that would be useful for any one looking into the below >> changes. >> > > Good point. I was going to do that but forgot. Is it okay to > add that under COMMENTS in METADATA or is that for something else? > I couldn't find any precedent in the existing code. > > Laca > > >> - Sriram >> >> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >> >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~laca/libxml2-2.7.6/ fixes the following >>> bugs: >>> >>> 6745178 update libxml2 to 2.7.1 (or later) >>> 6832483 Python libxml not available for 2.5, 2.6 >>> 6849500 libxslt need to be updated within opensolaris >>> >>> Updates libxml2 to the latest (2.7.6), removes upstream patches >>> and adds some new patches that fix bugs discovered since the >>> release of 2.7.6. "globals.patch" makes some private functions >>> public. These functions used to be public and are included in >>> the Solaris mapfile. The patch effectively reverses the change >>> that made them private. >>> >>> Also updates libxslt to the latest (1.1.26). >>> >>> In both modules, the Python bindings are built twice: for >>> Python 2.4 and for Python 2.6. The 2.6 bindings are in >>> new packages SUNWlxml-python26 and SUNWlxsl-python26. >>> >>> Please review. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Laca >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list >>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss >>> >>> > > >
