On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:40:34PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:15:40AM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > Technically it should be possible to use SASL/GSSAPI without linking > > > with libgss at all. Can you confirm that mutt can / cannot do > > > SASL/GSSAPI just by configuring it with --with-sasl but without > > > --with-gss? > > I analyzed the situation and it looks like --with-gss is not needed once we > have --with-sasl. > > The SASL/GSSAPI support in mutt is handled by /usr/lib/sasl/gssapi.so.1 > library. OTOH, the direct GSSAPI support in mutt is covered by > /usr/lib/libgss.so library.
I would prefer the --with-sasl way. It seems that the --with-gss way re-implements (duplicates) functionality that we already have in Solaris' SASL implementation. I would prefer to avoid that duplication. > [...] > The above means that the CR 6805664 "Add GSS-API support to mutt" is duplicate > of CR 6780832 "Add SASL support to mutt". :) > In case when the situation described above will change in the future, we can > add direct GSSAPI support to mutt later. It shouldn't. > I'll close the CR 6805664 as duplicate of the CR 6780832. Excellent. > I uploaded new webrev at: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aragorn/6780832-mutt-sasl/ Looks good. > I'll update the new mutt binary built without the --with-gss in few hours. > Once > the build is finished. Thanks. I'll test it tomorrow. Nico --
