On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:32:34PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:15:40AM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:56:11PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > - Would it be better to patch configure.ac instead of configure? > > > > When I would patch configure.ac the configure needs to be either patched > > too or > > regenerated. Regeneration on the fly needs some extra tools like autoconf. > > Patching of both configure.ac and configure would technically end in very > > similar situation as I have now where I patched the configure only. During > > the > > build nobody cares about the configure.ac content. > > Huh? We don't have autoconf installed on build servers?
We do. But additional complexity is not good if I can easily avoid it. :-) > > > > Can you please test that using white/light foreground color on > > > black/dark foreground color? > > > > I tested both old mutt and the new one with different color settings of mutt > > and terminal and in all cases the color output from both mutts was exactly > > the > > same. The only difference were extra spaces with the old mutt. > > Will you submit this patch upstream? Already done http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3392 Thanks. -- Marcel Telka RPE, Systems
