On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:38:15PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:40:34PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 09:15:40AM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > > Technically it should be possible to use SASL/GSSAPI without linking > > > > with libgss at all. Can you confirm that mutt can / cannot do > > > > SASL/GSSAPI just by configuring it with --with-sasl but without > > > > --with-gss? > > > > I analyzed the situation and it looks like --with-gss is not needed once we > > have --with-sasl. > > > > The SASL/GSSAPI support in mutt is handled by /usr/lib/sasl/gssapi.so.1 > > library. OTOH, the direct GSSAPI support in mutt is covered by > > /usr/lib/libgss.so library. > > I would prefer the --with-sasl way. It seems that the --with-gss way > re-implements (duplicates) functionality that we already have in > Solaris' SASL implementation. I would prefer to avoid that duplication.
Yes, same here. > > > [...] > > The above means that the CR 6805664 "Add GSS-API support to mutt" is > > duplicate > > of CR 6780832 "Add SASL support to mutt". > > :) > > > In case when the situation described above will change in the future, we can > > add direct GSSAPI support to mutt later. > > It shouldn't. Ok, but never say never :-). > > > I'll close the CR 6805664 as duplicate of the CR 6780832. > > Excellent. > > > I uploaded new webrev at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aragorn/6780832-mutt-sasl/ > > Looks good. Thank you! > > > I'll update the new mutt binary built without the --with-gss in few hours. > > Once > > the build is finished. > > Thanks. I'll test it tomorrow. -- Marcel Telka RPE, Systems
