I'm confused -- are you building HEAD or are you building at that revision?
I definitely can't reproduce any build errors against HEAD, but I haven't
tried that revision again specifically since it was committed.

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> El dom, 11-05-2008 a las 13:36 -0400, Vincent Siveton escribió:
> > Hi Santiago,
> >
> > Yes I second.
> > Hope to see a zone and a CI soon :)
>
> I actually built a git branch with all commits since this one (except
> for the changeset at r654993) and it works with HEAD (actually my
> purpose doing this was to test that my last commit was not breaking the
> build at all).
>
> Waiting for the build to be restored, be it via the patch removed, the
> tests removed or fixed or the code paths fixed. I have no clue how
> things are interacting, but the patch in this issue are about
> SimpleDateFormat(s) and the tests failing are both dealing with the
> Expires: header (a DateFormat is of course needed for the Expires
> header).
>
> Regards
> Santiago
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > 2008/5/11, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I'm getting an error with failed tests, after "mvn clean; mvn".
> > >
> > >  I used git bisect to find where the build started to fail and found
> that
> > >  commit r654993 (Applying SHINDIG-257, contributed by Brian Eaton.) is
> > >  the first failing.
> > >
> > >  I'm not certain about the error or how to fix it, but it is something
> > >  like:
> > >
> > >  (...)
> > >  Failed tests:
> > >
>  
> testCacheableForFutureExpires(org.apache.shindig.gadgets.BasicContentCacheTest)
> > >
>  
> testCacheableForExpiresWithWait(org.apache.shindig.gadgets.BasicContentCacheTest)
> > >  Tests run: 252, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> > >
> > >  Anybody else seeing this?
> > >
> > >  Regards
> > >  Santiago
> > >
> > > --
> > >  Santiago Gala
> > >  http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ <http://memojo.com/%7Esgala/blog/>
> > >
> > >
> --
> Santiago Gala
> http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ <http://memojo.com/%7Esgala/blog/>
>
>

Reply via email to