Tom,
>Now my next project
with GD is to convince them they need to publish a booklet and side article on
top clubmakers just like they do for top teachers of the golf
swing every year.
The initial response on this idea from Mike is positive, but now it has to go to
the higher ups, which is always tough in the face of remembering where their ad
dollars come from. But I’ll keep plugging because this side of the
industry deserves a lot more respect and things like that could help a
lot.
You may or may not remember, but my
dad was tech editor for GD from mid-60s to mid-70s and wrote an
equipment article or two for them over the years. In the July 1965 issue,
his article "Why curved clubfaces produce straighter shots" even made the cover.
But, his main job was editing. At first, they sent him a lot of articles with
questionable "truths", and they followed through on most of
his recommendations. But when his changes conflicted with an advertiser's
claims, his changes were usually ignored. Eventually, they just ignored him
when an advertiser was involved, and so many untruths and half-truths were
printed that he resigned. I've had a very low opinion of GD ever since.
But, that was some years ago...maybe they've changed.
There were some moments in his work with GD
which I remember very fondly. Once they sent him an article from a Northwestern
University professor who had mathematically proven that 22° was the ideal loft
for a driver. Well, that was 1964 and dad's driving machine research in the late
1930s had shown the ideal loft for the Spalding drivers to be 11°. So, I
guess he figured he had just better check what launch angle the
pros were hitting by 1964 and got both of us some tickets from GD for
the US Open at Congressional just two hours from our house. We spent two days
rudimentally marking ball height and pacing off distances to figure out
approximate launch angles..and every one was about 11° to 12°. That was the
first time I watched Arnie play...and remember watching Venturi stagger in the
18th a winner in spite of the heat. What a great experience that was for me! Dad
never said how he answered the article, but I noticed that GD never printed
it.
Wish you luck with GD. Custom components and
clubmaking sure deserve more attention from the golf media than they are
getting. But, the OEMs seem to be fighting it every way they can. Someone needs
to start a golf publication that's industry wide and totally custom club
oriented...cutting into some of the traditional media's business might get
their attention. Maybe publish it on the internet. Would a lot of component
companies, PCS and pro clubmakers support such a venture?
Bernie Writeto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles GEORGE HUSON
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Don Flatgard
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles BBIRDNYPD
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Fjbold1
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Arniesclubs
- RE: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Tom Wishon
- RE: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Royce Engler
- RE: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Tom Byers
- ShopTalk: Top Clubmakers / GD / Dr. Loft Bernie Baymiller
- ShopTalk: Top Clubmakers / GD / Dr. Loft Harry F. Schiestel
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Jeremy Ingle
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Tom... Jeremy Ingle
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Arniesclubs
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles tflan
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Richard Kennedy
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Arniesclubs
- Re: ShopTalk: Golf Digest Higher loft articles Don Flatgard