I totally agree with you on Google. It could be better but it still is
my favorite.
Have a great day.
Tom Mason
Dave Tutelman wrote:
Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
I still prefer Google for the maps themselves. And Google maps does a
better job of finding a location from the description. And Google
refreshes the screen much faster as you move around. But, for the
places I've looked, live.com is as good or better for detail in the
aerial/satellite view, and the birds-eye view is unique and excellent.
Example: check out Clover Valley Golf Club in Johnstown, OH on both
sites. Get in as close as you can. How much detail can you resolve. No
comparison, right? Now switch to birds-eye view in live.com. Even better!
Cheers!
DaveT
At 07:01 AM 3/17/2009, Tom and Donna wrote:
--
Shoptalk ** Sponsored by the new Aldila Voodoo.
Learn more at http://aldilavoodoo.com/
