On 11/29/2012 10:00 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> It issues an error when a conflicting initialization is detected. >> > I see. I just had more time to look over the condition target code (both > kernel and iptables) and don't foresee any problems with introducing > this new parameter - I might have a working copy of these changes by the > weekend. If that happens, would you be willing to change the way > shorewall initialises the switches?
Sure. > If so, you may need to introduce > some sort of new/old condition match capability though. Yes. I assume that you will be willing to test the detection of that capability (I can obviously test detection of its absence); it needs to be tested with 'show capabilities' and in the compiler. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
