On 11/29/2012 10:32 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 10:00 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> If so, you may need to introduce
>> some sort of new/old condition match capability though.
>
> Yes. I assume that you will be willing to test the detection of that
> capability (I can obviously test detection of its absence); it needs to
> be tested with 'show capabilities' and in the compiler.
>
I just realized that condition match is part of xtables-addons so if you
want to send me your patch, I'll test it with Shorewall.
I believe that the xtables parser requires an option per value so the
syntax will be something like:
condition match options:
[!] --condition name Match on boolean value stored in procfs file
--condinit value
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts
and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
