> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 17:53 +0200, Simon Matter wrote: >> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 06:48 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: >> > >> >> No, sorry - I've tried to reproduce this problem on Foobar6.1 which >> is >> >> RHEL6-based and I'm seeing no problem. >> > >> > I've done a bit more testing. Foobar6.1 is running kernel >> > 2.6.32-131.17.1 whereas my Centos6 installation is running >> > 2.6.32-71.29.1. Foobar6.1 works as expected while Centos6 shows >> download >> > speeds significantly below IN-BANDWIDTH. I'm seeing 22-23Mbit when I >> set >> > the IN-BANDWIDTH to 30mbit. While that is not as bad as you are >> seeing, >> > it shows that there are significant differences between RHEL6 kernel >> > versions. >> >> Hm, I have to redo my tests then. My initial testing was with CentOS 6 >> on >> box A. Box B also and still runs CentOS 6 while box A now runs stock >> RHEL6.1 kernel. So, it may be that only the testbox running CentOS is >> affected, I'll test it later today. > > I added the centos-cr repo and updated my CentOS 6 VM. It now runs at > full speed.
Tom, did you test with complex TC or simple TC? I've just tested adding burst on one of the existing EL4 systems and it indeed increases the download speed to almost full speed. However, the same config on the EL6 box just doesn't work at all even with the latest official RHEL6.1 kernel. Thanks, Simon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
