On 07/04/2012 09:32 PM, Anshuman Aggarwal wrote:
> I'm actually running both squid and apt-cacher-ng. Squid uses
> apt-cacher-ng internally as a parent, only for deb packages to save
> bandwidth since apt-cacher handles that better than squid...and both
> do it transparently.
> Here is how it's supposed to work and was working earlier before I
> upgraded to Ubuntu Precise from Lucid.
>
> web request outgoing on port 80 -> FW -> port 33128 (squid) -> Internet
> apt request outgoing on port 80 -> FW -> port 33128 (squid) -> port
> 33142 (apt) -> Internet
>
> note both squid and apt are running locally on the firewall machine,
> under the primary group proxy.
>
> Attaching compressed shore wall dump

In the dump, I don't see any process listening on port 33142.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to