> Right -- it isn't valid. Packets routed to/from eth1.10 are NOT routed
> to/from eth1. In this configuration, eth1 doesn't have an IP address
> at all so Netfilter won't match any packets against eth1.

Ok, makes sense.

> - define one zone Z that includes all three eth.nn,
> - specify REJECT for the Z->Z policy.
> - Use rules to specify which traffic is allowed.

So in effect, is this what you mean? --

/etc/shorewall/zones
loc      ipv4
http:loc ipv4
mail:loc ipv4
ftp:loc  ipv4

/etc/shorewall/interfaces
...
loc  eth1.10
loc  eth1.11
loc  eth1.12

/etc/shorewall/hosts
http  eth1.10:0.0.0.0/0
mail  eth1.11:0.0.0.0/0
ftp   eth1.12:0.0.0.0/0

It seems that, in this scenario, the firewall would not care for the
IPs behind a certain vlan which seems to be quite handy, for example if
I add another HTTP server to vlan 10.

Thank you,
Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to