On 3/30/2014 7:09 AM, İlker Aktuna wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I'm sorry that I come back so late. I was busy with other issues. > > I tried both of your suggestions but neither has helped me. Actually > I was looking for a port based routing mechanism but it seems that it > is not possible even with the so valuable ip-tables of linux. (weird > ?)
It works well for forwarded traffic, but not so well for traffic originating on the gateway. > > Now I have another idea; to keep the port 5060 of ppp0 busy so that > Asterisk can not listen on it. Is there a dummy app which can do that > ? (I am looking for an app with very few cpu utilization so that it > doesn't get a burden on the cpu) Or even, would it be possible to > keeping that port busy using ip-tables ? I assume that when you specify 'all interfaces' for asterisk, that it binds its socket to 0.0.0.0:5060. I believe that fails if there is an application that has bound to the same port on a specific interface. > > Btw, my Shorewall configuration works by tracling the pakets on both > ISP connections. So if a connection is made through ppp1, all packets > of the same session go through that interface. Why doesn't this work > for packets incoming to that interface ? > It does work that way. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
