Hi. When I try to apply a policy a second time (even without changing it) from a shorewall6 5.0.14.1 machine to a remote shorewall6-lite 5.1.8 machine I get an error:
Initializing... Adding Providers... RTNETLINK answers: File exists ERROR: Command "/usr/bin/ip -6 route replace default scope global table 250 nexthop dev eth0.2 weight 1 nexthop dev pppoe-wan1 weight 1 nexthop via 2001:123:1c:456::1 dev 6in4-henet weight 1" Failed Restoring Shorewall6 Lite... Initializing... Adding Providers... RTNETLINK answers: File exists ERROR: Command "ip -6 route replace default scope global table 250 nexthop dev eth0.2 weight 1 nexthop dev pppoe-wan1 weight 1 nexthop via 2001:123:1c:456::1 dev 6in4-henet weight 1" Failed Preparing ip6tables-restore input... Running /usr/sbin/ip6tables-restore... IPv6 Forwarding Enabled Terminated Terminated Looking at table 250: # ip -6 route ls table 250 default via 2001:123:1c:456::1 dev 6in4-henet metric 1024 pref medium Is it expected that ip should be able to replace the above with what shorewall6 wants to replace it with and this is a bug in the ip tool or is there something wrong with the replacement specification? If I flush that table an re-run the remote-reload, unsurprisingly it succeeds. Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
