On 11/25/2017 08:10 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 16:31 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: >> >> This is a known problem -- see the known problems section of current >> releasenotes. Basically, 'balance' doesn't work with IPv6 because the >> above routes are not balanced routes but rather two separate routes >> with >> different metrics. > > So what's my solution, when running the 5.0[.14.1] release to at least > not having to flush that routing table before reloading the rule set? > > To be honest, I don't really want balancing on my IPv6 connections -- > one is metered and the other unmetered, but given that the individual > nodes behind choose which Internet connection they are going to use (by > choosing their source IP address), there is not much I can do about it, > AFAIK.
Then why not make one the primary and the other the fallback? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with Shoreline, \ an international standard? Washington, USA \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you can't http://shorewall.org \ understand \_______________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
