OK. Thanks to both of you.

-- 
 Hippo Man
 hippo...@gmail.com
 Take a hippopotamus to lunch today.


On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:36 PM C. Cook <c.a.c...@quantum-sci.com> wrote:

> On 12/26/18 3:25 PM, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>
> I'm running on the ancient CentOS-4.8, and there is no feasible way to
> upgrade this system in the forseeable future.
>
> I'd like to get Shorewall running on that system, if possible, and I
> wonder if someone could recommend the proper version of Shorewall to
> download that would work on this Stone-Age version of CentOS.
>
> Thank you for any pointers or suggestions.
>
> --
>  Hippo Man
>  hippo...@gmail.com
>  Take a hippopotamus to lunch today.
>
> Whatever application is depending on this, is not immortal.  There is a
> modern form or one can be made.  If you can't make it consider these gig
> job websites or Mechanical Turk.
>
> If it were a $1.2M mainframe or Cray that's 8 years old, fine, but come
> on.  What you're doing is busted.
>
> CentOS 4.8 has so many other vulnerabilities that if you choose to keep
> running it the only secure option is a walled garden as Damiano suggested.
> Ideally presenting an API with restricted commands and input structure.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to